Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxx> writes: > On 05/29/2013 12:58 PM, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: >> Hi Kevin, >> >> Thanks a lot for your comments. >> >> On 05/28/2013 09:45 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> >>>> >>>> vpboundsintr_en is available inside the IP block as an re-sycned >>>> version and one which is not. Due to this, there is an 1 sysclk >>>> cycle window where interruptz could be asserted low for 1 cycle. >>> ^^^ >>> >>> Is that the way the cool kidz are spelling interrupts these days? ;) >> >> Oh! Shame on me. Thank you for catching this :) > > Shame on me again (((. Name "interruptz" is more less OK. This is the > name of signal between Voltage Processor and SmartReflex. > In documentation it is referenced as "SR_SInterruptz". Anyway commit > message should be updated to make this more clear. Ah, OK. Makes sense now. Yes, the changlog should be more clear that this is referring to a signal name, e.g. ...there is an 1 sysclk cycle window where the SR_SInterruptz signal could be asserted low. (also note that I think the "for once cycle" that ends that phrase in the original changelog is redundant, since it already says a "1 sysclk cycle window". Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html