RE: [net-next resend PATCH 1/6] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:27:41, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@xxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:24:58 +0530
> 
> > +		priv->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl,
> > +						PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT);
> 
> This is not indented correctly.
> 
> Argument on the second, and subsequent, lines of a function call
> must start at the first column after the openning parenthesis of
> the function call itself.

Well, if I am correct, doing so will make the line cross 80 character limit.
If you could (please I ask), can you let me know how it can be handled in 
above situation. I will make the changes/corrections and re-send it.

Thanks a lot in advance.

> 
> Please audit for this problem in your entire patch series, fix
> it up, and resubmit the full set of patches.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


Regards, 
Gururaja
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux