On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:39:00AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:32:06AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:21:51AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > How about we pass yours for not reading the patch before flaming ? > > > > And another thing. If you want to be flamed, continue with that tone. > > The problem here is that *you* have not been flamed in the previous > > message. The previous message was all about pointing out an error in > > the code in a way that hopefully you will take notice of, because you > > showed no sign of taking any notice of my previous mail. > > > > If you want to be a total dork, continue behaving as you currently are. > > There, *now* I *have* flamed you! > > what a load of crap. Just because it wasn't pointed out in my previous > email doesn't automatically mean I haven't noticed. Anyway, I won't be > doing this all day. Yes you are a load of crap *you* spout about people flaming you. Well, if you can't be bothered to acknowledge a problem then you can expect to get resends because it's not clear that the message has been received. And you do *not* call resends "flames" back to those who were kind enough put the effort in to tell you about them more than once. That's just down right insulting and flame provoking. Which is exactly how we ended up here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
