Hi, On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:32:06AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:21:51AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > How about we pass yours for not reading the patch before flaming ? > > And another thing. If you want to be flamed, continue with that tone. > The problem here is that *you* have not been flamed in the previous > message. The previous message was all about pointing out an error in > the code in a way that hopefully you will take notice of, because you > showed no sign of taking any notice of my previous mail. > > If you want to be a total dork, continue behaving as you currently are. > There, *now* I *have* flamed you! what a load of crap. Just because it wasn't pointed out in my previous email doesn't automatically mean I haven't noticed. Anyway, I won't be doing this all day. cheers -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
