From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:03:24 +0200 > David, how did this happen? The patch I've sent > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg234240.html > > adds this to the probe function, according to the net-next tree it was > added to cpsw_probe_dual_emac(). The context is similar but not exact > the same. This is usually I ask people to respin patches even if there are minor fuzz differences when I try to apply this patch. I tried to be nice and save you some work this time, 'patch' accepted it with minor offsets, and with a cursory glance I didn't see any problems. Next time I'll be a hardliner and request a respin :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
