On 04/26/2013 01:30 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 4e2d224..59c4391 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -1633,7 +1633,6 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dual_emac(struct platform_device *pdev,
> priv_sl2->irqs_table[i] = priv->irqs_table[i];
> priv_sl2->num_irqs = priv->num_irqs;
> }
> - priv->irq_enabled = true;
> ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER;
>
> ndev->netdev_ops = &cpsw_netdev_ops;
> @@ -1679,6 +1678,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> priv->msg_enable = netif_msg_init(debug_level, CPSW_DEBUG);
> priv->rx_packet_max = max(rx_packet_max, 128);
> priv->cpts = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct cpts), GFP_KERNEL);
> + priv->irq_enabled = true;
> if (!ndev) {
> pr_err("error allocating cpts\n");
> goto clean_ndev_ret;
David, how did this happen? The patch I've sent
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg234240.html
adds this to the probe function, according to the net-next tree it was
added to cpsw_probe_dual_emac(). The context is similar but not exact
the same.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
