* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [130405 15:15]:
> How does the following look?
> Option a) not have a dummy node if CPUFREQ_CPU0 is not configured:
> static inline void omap_init_cpufreq(void)
> {
> struct platform_device_info devinfo = { };
>
> if (!of_have_populated_dt())
> devinfo.name = "omap-cpufreq";
> else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0))
> devinfo.name = "cpufreq-cpu0"
>
> if (devinfo.name)
> platform_device_register_full(&devinfo);
> }
>
> Option b) leave a dummy node registered
> static inline void omap_init_cpufreq(void)
> {
> struct platform_device_info devinfo = { };
>
> if (!of_have_populated_dt())
> devinfo.name = "omap-cpufreq";
> else
> devinfo.name = "cpufreq-cpu0"
>
> platform_device_register_full(&devinfo);
> }
>
> If there are no objections to (b), I dont mind it either.
To me option (b) looks better as it's if else :)
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
