Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:55:47PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > const ? Maybe provide a:
> >
> > #define DEFINE_PHY_OPS(name) \
> > const struct phy_ops #name_phy_ops = {
> >
> > macro ? This will force people to add the const keyword :-)
>
> Forcing people to use const structures is good, but I think it would be
> better without the macro, just by marking the argument in
> devm_phy_create() as const.
that won't force the definition of the struct to be const, however. But
I get your point.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
