On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > const ? Maybe provide a: > > #define DEFINE_PHY_OPS(name) \ > const struct phy_ops #name_phy_ops = { > > macro ? This will force people to add the const keyword :-) Forcing people to use const structures is good, but I think it would be better without the macro, just by marking the argument in devm_phy_create() as const. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html