On Thursday 14 March 2013 03:58 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Santosh, >>>> >>>> [..] >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast >>>>>>> source, or that it is selected as a local timer in preference of real timers? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Dummy timer is preferred over real broadcast timer. >>>>> >>>>> Ok. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>> I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't >>>>> override a real timer elsewhere. >>>>> >>>> Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ? >>>> Would be good to get this one merged as well. >>> >>> Sure. Though could you reword the commit message? The patch solves the more >>> general issue of a dummy being preferred over real hardware even outside of >>> choosing the broadcast device. >>> >>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks. For record, patch is in end of the email which I plan >> to put into patch system. >> >> Regards, >> Santosh > > The below patch seems fine. Are you intending for this to go in as a fix for > 3.9-rc*, or as a cleanup for 3.10? > Fix for 3.9-rc*. I have put already it in patch system. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
