On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>> Hi Santosh, > > [..] > > >>> > >>> Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast > >>> source, or that it is selected as a local timer in preference of real timers? > >>> > >> Dummy timer is preferred over real broadcast timer. > > > > Ok. [...] > > I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't > > override a real timer elsewhere. > > > Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ? > Would be good to get this one merged as well. Sure. Though could you reword the commit message? The patch solves the more general issue of a dummy being preferred over real hardware even outside of choosing the broadcast device. Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
