On 03/02/2013 05:48 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:22:47AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Currently the OMAP GPIO driver uses a legacy mapping for the GPIO IRQ >> domain. This is not necessary because we do not need to assign a >> specific interrupt number to the GPIO IRQ domain. Therefore, convert >> the OMAP GPIO driver to use a linear mapping instead. >> >> Please note that this also allows to simplify the logic in the OMAP >> gpio_irq_handler() routine, by using irq_find_mapping() to obtain the >> virtual irq number from the GPIO bank and bank index. >> >> Reported-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > Just one suggestion below for a later patch. > >> @@ -680,7 +686,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) >> { >> void __iomem *isr_reg = NULL; >> u32 isr; >> - unsigned int gpio_irq, gpio_index; >> + unsigned int i; >> struct gpio_bank *bank; >> int unmasked = 0; >> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); >> @@ -721,15 +727,10 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) >> if (!isr) >> break; >> >> - gpio_irq = bank->irq_base; >> - for (; isr != 0; isr >>= 1, gpio_irq++) { >> - int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, gpio_irq); >> - >> + for (i = 0; isr != 0; isr >>= 1, i++) { >> if (!(isr & 1)) >> continue; > > this will iterate over all 32 GPIOs, a better way to handle this would > be to have something like: Worse case, if only bit 31 was set then I agree this is not that efficient. Or even if one bit is set. However, the loop itself will iterate while isr != 0 so not always over each bit. No different to the existing code. > while (isr) { > unsigned long bit = __ffs(isr); > > /* clear this bit */ > isr &= ~bit; > > generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->domain, bit); > } > > this way you will only iterate the amount of bits enabled in the isr > register. Definitely cleaner but I am wondering which approach would be more efficient from an instruction standpoint. This could definitely be much more efficient if there is only a couple bits set. > ps: completely untested ;-) No problem. Thanks for the inputs. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html