On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:01:15PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Wednesday 20 February 2013 09:57 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:33:32PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >>>> default: > >>>> /* Unknown default to latest silicon rev as default*/ > >>>>- omap_revision = OMAP5430_REV_ES1_0; > >>>>+ omap_revision = OMAP5430_REV_ES2_0; > >>> > >>>how about we default to 0xffffffff ? That's the highest possible > >>>version, just not sure if our revision macros can cope with it. > >>> > >>:D > >>For record, it was decided that we will always have latest silicon > >>spin as default and hence OMAP5_ES2 > > > >but then this line will forever be modified. Every year or so :-p > > > No... Unless and until we spin new silicon revision for OMAP5 > every year. This is OMAP5 specific ID code function. oh, right. nevermind then -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
