On 02/05/2013 10:16 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: > On 01/02/13 19:39, Mark Jackson wrote: >> On 01/02/13 17:12, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> On 02/01/2013 10:56 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: >>>> There's plenty of DT support going in for NAND flash, but is there any work going on to support NOR >>>> flash ? >>> >>> What board and device are you working that is using NOR? I have a >>> OMAP2420 H4 with NOR that I have been doing a bit of maintenance for but >>> I don't spend much time on it. Eventually it will have to be done but it >>> is always good to know if there is a pressing need. >> >> We have a custom AM335x CPU board (arriving on my desk within the next few weeks) that has both NAND >> and NOR Flash. >> >>>> And how about SRAM chips or other memory mapped devices ? >>> >>> Not sure about SRAM (trying to think if I have a board with SRAM even), >>> but definitely, boards using the GPMC to interface to ethernet chips >>> need to be added. >> >> The board also contains an FRAM chip (which is just treated as SRAM). >> >> If you'd anything in the pipeline, I'm glad to help in any testing. I've created a custom cape board >> for the BeagleBone which contains the NOR flash and FRAM chips, so I'm not waiting for the new >> hardware to arrive. Sorry for the delay. I personally don't have anything in the pipe. Afzal, do you know of anyone looking at this? > I've experimented with trying to add a mtd-physmap device, but no joy. > > I'm guessing that the current mtd-physmap code is (in some way) currently incompatible with the GPMC > device ? I am not familiar with mtd-physmap to comment. Is that DT specific? Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
