* Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> [130201 17:25]: > > On 02/01/2013 03:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > How about let's fix this properly to start with so we don't add > > more blockers moving this code to drivers/bus? > > > > Looks like gpmc_mem_init() gets called from gpmc_probe() so > > we can pass that information in pdev. > > I wondered if you would suggest that ;-) :) > I definitely can and it is probably best. Things like this become > painful when we move to device-tree. We really need a generic way for > passing stuff like this to drivers for omap. Our options are auxdata or > bus notifiers. I am wondering whether we can plug pdata in the > omap_device bus notifier for device-tree. Let me know if you have any > thoughts. Hmm but in this case can't you just do it based on the compatible flag? For legacy systems we also need to pass it in pdata. Regarding omap_device, we should find a way to keep the dependencies between drivers and the bus code down to minimum. So ideally things like this would be only done using just the compatible flag. But the pdata we cannot remove quite yet. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
