* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [130131 07:41]: > On Thursday 31 January 2013 21:02:00 Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > The timekeeping doesn't depend on HZ value in presence of fine grained > > clocksource and hence there should not be any time drift because of HZ > > value which was chosen to be divisor of 32768. > > > > OMAP has been using HZ = 128 value to avoid any time drift issues > > because of 32768 HZ clock. But with various measurements performed > > with HZ = 100, no time drift is observed and it also proves the > > point about HZ not having impact on time keeping on OMAP. > > > > Very informative thread on this topic is here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/435 > > > > Special thanks to John Stulz, Arnd Bergmann and Russell King for their > > valuable suggestions. > > > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Thanks so much for looking into this! Great thanks for checking it Santosh! Applying into omap-for-v3.9/soc. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
