On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:31:53, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Philip" == Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> Philip> From: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@xxxxxx>
> Philip> Add GPMC data node to AM33XX device tree file.
>
> Philip> Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@xxxxxx>
> Philip> ---
> Philip> arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
> Philip> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> Philip> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> Philip> index eaef5e7..f4209d8 100644
> Philip> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> Philip> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> Philip> @@ -393,5 +393,17 @@
> Philip> ti,hwmods = "elm";
> Philip> status = "disabled";
> Philip> };
> Philip> +
> Philip> + gpmc: gpmc@50000000 {
> Philip> + compatible = "ti,am3352-gpmc";
> Philip> + ti,hwmods = "gpmc";
> Philip> + reg = <0x50000000 0x2000>;
> Philip> + interrupts = <100>;
> Philip> + num-cs = <8>;
>
> Next to Jan's comment about am335x having 7 cs signals, I just realized
> the difference in compatible string between the gpmc and elm. The gpmc
> refers to a real device (which is afaik how it should be done), but the
> elm compatible is simply ti,am33xx-elm.
>
> Presumably it should have been ti,am3352-elm in the binding instead?
I thought of following the file name convention. I will correct to "ti,am3352-elm"
>
> Other than that it looks fine.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Avinash
>
> --
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
