On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:43:24 +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2013 11:31 AM, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 19:22:37 +0100, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> * srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130121 05:19]: > >> > >> Forgot to complete the subject and add the description? > > > > No :) It has the subject, but description is intentionally skipped > > because subject has all the meaning and it is a part of the series > > of patches I sent.. > > > "ARM: mach-omap2: apply the errata at run time rather" > > Subject doesn't have all the meaning till you read the series ;) > Like, this is Pl310 XYZ errata etc. Anyway once you sort > out the concerns from RMK and with a few lines of > description on subject patch, you can add my ack on OMAP > patches. thanks, the description part will be fixed. Can you check RMK's comment on set_debug patch, patch 1/4? I need your comment on that to roll it over because set_debug is something which is OMAP specific.. > > Thanks a lot for doing this. > > Regards, > Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
