Re: Question regarding broadcast timer/cpuidle and /proc/interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 21 January 2013 07:47 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

Hi All,

I have a question regarding the behavior of cpuidle on pandaboard.

1. cpuidle is enabled

2. The deep idle states seem to be reach

for i in $(find /sys/devices/system/cpu -name "usage"); do echo "$i :
$(cat $i)"; done
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state0/usage : 7049
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state1/usage : 17
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state2/usage : 1341
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpuidle/state0/usage : 6318
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpuidle/state1/usage : 17
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpuidle/state2/usage : 1341

3. Regarding the cpuidle driver code : the "state1" and "state2" are
coupled states where the broadcast timer is used instead of the local
timer. I assume this is because they go down when we reach these idle
states.

Thats correct. Local timer are not wakeup capable and hence we switch
to a wakeup capable broadcast timer.

4. The content of /proc/interrupts shows no broadcast timer used at all.

...
IPI1:          0          0  Timer broadcast interrupts
...

Shouldn't be the broadcast timer used sometimes ? or did I miss something ?

There might be an issue with status updating. Just look for gptimer1
interrupts. if they are incrementing then, broadcast is being used
but just the status update isn't happening some how.

regards
santosh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux