On Monday, January 21, 2013 02:45:32 PM MyungJoo Ham wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday, January 18, 2013 01:52:31 PM Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Despite being documented in function documentation and in > >> Documentation/power/opp.txt, many of the users of OPP APIs > >> dont honor RCU lock usage appropriately. > >> > >> This recently appeared in IRC discussion earlier today [1]. > >> I did an audit of current usage and the following series > >> is a result of this. > >> > >> NOTE: > >> 1. The patch "PM / devfreq: exynos4_bus: honor RCU lock usage" has only > >> been build tested as I dont have an exynos platform to try it on. I have > >> tried to make it as least intrusive as possible and at least reviewed > >> to ensure I haven't screwed anything up. > >> > >> Other than this, I have added appropriate tested by information in requisite > >> patches. > > > > Thanks for the fixes. > > > > MyungJoo, do you want me to take the devfreq ones too? > > > > Rafael > > Yes, please take RCU-OPP patches. Having those patches splitted > doesn't seem beneficial. OK, I will take them. > I'll let other devfreq patches be based on this after you get them applied. OK Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
