Hello.
On 02-01-2013 19:00, Roger Quadros wrote:
Both OMAP4 and 5 exhibit the same revision ID in the REVISION register
but they have different number of ports i.e. 2 and 3 respectively.
So we can't rely on REVISION register for number of ports on OMAP5
and depend on platform data (or device tree) instead.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
index 5edb828..710460d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
@@ -497,19 +497,27 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
- switch (omap->usbhs_rev) {
- case OMAP_USBHS_REV1:
- omap->nports = 3;
- break;
- case OMAP_USBHS_REV2:
- omap->nports = 2;
- break;
- default:
- omap->nports = OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS;
- dev_dbg(dev,
- "USB HOST Rev : 0x%d not recognized, assuming %d ports\n",
- omap->usbhs_rev, omap->nports);
- break;
+ /*
+ * If platform data contains nports then use that
+ * else make out number of ports from USBHS revision
+ */
+ if (pdata->nports) {
+ omap->nports = pdata->nports;
+ } else {
+ switch (omap->usbhs_rev) {
+ case OMAP_USBHS_REV1:
+ omap->nports = 3;
+ break;
+ case OMAP_USBHS_REV2:
+ omap->nports = 2;
+ break;
+ default:
+ omap->nports = OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS;
+ dev_dbg(dev,
+ "USB HOST Rev:0x%d not recognized, assuming %d ports\n",
Please indent the string to the right somewhat, as it was before.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
