On 11/21/2012 03:54 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:34:09PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Enable the optional HSIC clocks (60MHz and 480MHz) for the ports
>> that are configured in HSIC mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>> index 0d39bd7..e5ba193 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
>>
>> struct usbhs_port {
>> struct clk *utmi_clk;
>> + struct clk *hsic60m_clk;
>> + struct clk *hsic480m_clk;
>> };
>>
>> struct usbhs_hcd_omap {
>> @@ -300,6 +302,26 @@ static int usbhs_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Enable HSIC clocks if required */
>> + if (is_ehci_hsic_mode(pdata->port_mode[i])) {
>> + if (omap->port[i].hsic60m_clk) {
>> + r = clk_enable(omap->port[i].hsic60m_clk);
>> + if (r) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "%s: Can't enable port %d hsic60m clk : %d\n",
>> + __func__, i, r);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (omap->port[i].hsic480m_clk) {
>> + r = clk_enable(omap->port[i].hsic480m_clk);
>> + if (r) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "%s: Can't enable port %d hsic480m clk : %d\n",
>> + __func__, i, r);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>
> with this deep indentation, it should've caught your attention that
> something can definitely be re-factored.
OK.
>
>> @@ -323,6 +345,14 @@ static int usbhs_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> if (omap->port[i].utmi_clk)
>> clk_disable(omap->port[i].utmi_clk);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (is_ehci_hsic_mode(pdata->port_mode[i])) {
>> + if (omap->port[i].hsic60m_clk)
>> + clk_disable(omap->port[i].hsic60m_clk);
>> +
>> + if (omap->port[i].hsic480m_clk)
>> + clk_disable(omap->port[i].hsic480m_clk);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> if (omap->ehci_logic_fck && !IS_ERR(omap->ehci_logic_fck))
>> @@ -575,6 +605,7 @@ static int __devinit usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> for (i = 0; i < omap->nports; i++) {
>> struct clk *pclk;
>> char utmi_clk[] = "usb_host_hs_utmi_px_clk";
>> + char hsic_clk[] = "usb_host_hs_hsic480m_px_clk";
>
> same comment from another patch. Was this lazyness ?
:)
>
>> @@ -590,6 +621,21 @@ static int __devinit usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> else
>> omap->port[i].utmi_clk = pclk;
>>
>> + sprintf(hsic_clk, "usb_host_hs_hsic480m_p%d_clk", i + 1);
>
> will overflow if 'i' ever goes over 8.
>
>> + pclk = clk_get(dev, hsic_clk);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pclk))
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock : %s : %ld\n",
>> + hsic_clk, PTR_ERR(pclk));
>> + else
>> + omap->port[i].hsic480m_clk = pclk;
>> +
>> + sprintf(hsic_clk, "usb_host_hs_hsic60m_p%d_clk", i + 1);
>
> ditto.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
