The original commit was not documenting correctly the behavior of the cycle configuration. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> --- Hi Thierry, small update to the new pwm-twl-led driver to correct the comment describing the cycle configuration for the PWMA/B of TWL4030. The update is on top of v3 of the twl pwm series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/20/193 Regards, Peter drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c index 9468720..e62b95e 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static int twl4030_pwmled_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, * 0 -> off cycle = 2, * 1 -> off cycle = 2, * 2 -> off cycle = 3, - * 125 - > off cycle 127, - * 126 - > off cycle 1 + * 126 - > off cycle 127, + * 127 - > off cycle 1 * When on cycle == off cycle the PWM will be always on */ duty_cycle += 1; -- 1.8.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html