On 11/09/2012 06:21 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> [121109 15:59]: >> >> Sorry, I meant in the fixes series I have posted for dmtimer, I am >> adding a new function called omap_dm_timer_populate_errata() that is >> using cpu_is_xxxx() [1]. I had done this a while back, but now I see >> that we want to get away from doing that right? > > Yes. Looks like everything we have under plat-omap can be moved > to live under drivers eventually, so let's not use cpu_is_omap > there either. For legacy boot, you can use pdata->timer_capability > for passing that? Yes, but I prefer to keep capability and errata separate. So I have added an timer_errata variable to the pdata for now. >> I was planning on sending you a pull request for that series on Monday >> but now I am wondering if I should fix this now or later. I was hoping >> this series would make 3.8. > > Yeah, sounds like that should be fixed though as we still have a bit > of time early next week. Ok, great. I have re-worked and will stress test over the weekend. I will send out an updated series Monday and then send a pull request later in the week if you are ok with it. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
