* Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> [121109 15:59]: > > Sorry, I meant in the fixes series I have posted for dmtimer, I am > adding a new function called omap_dm_timer_populate_errata() that is > using cpu_is_xxxx() [1]. I had done this a while back, but now I see > that we want to get away from doing that right? Yes. Looks like everything we have under plat-omap can be moved to live under drivers eventually, so let's not use cpu_is_omap there either. For legacy boot, you can use pdata->timer_capability for passing that? > I was planning on sending you a pull request for that series on Monday > but now I am wondering if I should fix this now or later. I was hoping > this series would make 3.8. Yeah, sounds like that should be fixed though as we still have a bit of time early next week. Regards, Tony > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135249008128365&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
