> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [121102 01:56]: > > On Friday 02 November 2012 02:19 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > >On 2012-11-02 08:38, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > >> > > >>Lets not move this in DMA code since the above is really related > > >>to frame buffer. It reserves more DMA area for dma_alloc_coherent() > > >>etc than default 2 MB. Infact, we should no longer need this with > > >>CMA and memblock in place. > > >> > > >>Tomi, > > >>Can we not get rid of the above memory reservation ? > > > > > >Yes, I think so. This one is only used for the old omapfb, i.e. omap1, > > >and I have no means to test it out, though. But below is a patch to > > >remove it. I also attached the patch, as it looks like thunderbird wants > > >to reformat the pasted patch... I'll remove the > > >CONFIG_FB_OMAP_CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE from the omapfb driver's Kconfig file > > >in my tree later. Hmm actually, is it safe to remove for omap1, or should we still keep it around for omap1? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
