On 2012-11-02 12:44, Archit Taneja wrote: > Hmm, that makes sense. Anyway, I don't think it's really bad if we refer > to dssdev->channel for now. It is, because dssdev->channel doesn't exist with DT. With DT we either need to figure out the channel in omapdss at runtime, or add a property to the DT data telling the channel. And adding such a property is not correct, as DT should be about describing the HW. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
