Tony, On 29 October 2012 12:52, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/omap_mailbox.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ > > This file should only contain pure platform data needed > by the core omap code to pass to the mailbox driver. Ok, looking at it closely, this header file is related to the API itself, there is nothing that could be actually considered as pure platform data, the structures are related with the mailbox framework and even if I split this file into two, the additional header would end up including the "platform_data" header unless I move save/restore_ctx functions and then export them as symbols for the API. So, it might be better for the entire file to sit in linux/include/mailbox/ then. > The mailbox API header should be somewhere else, > like include/linux/mailbox/mailbox-omap.h or similar. Ok. > But shouldn't this all now be handled by using the > remoteproc framework? Remoteproc doesn't handle the mailbox hardware directly, it still relies in the mailbox framework for the low level communications. E.g.: Proc1 has a message (virtqueue msg) queued to Proc2, uses mailbox msg to generate an interrupt to Proc2, Proc2 queries the message (virtqueue) based on the mailbox message received. Regards, Omar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
