* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [121008 10:37]: > Drivers should not use cpu_is_omap or cpu_class_is_omap macros, > they should be private to the platform init code. And we'll be > removing plat/cpu.h and only have a private soc.h for the > arch/arm/*omap* code. > > This patch is intended as preparation for the core omap changes > and removes the need to include plat/cpu.h from several drivers. > This is needed for the ARM common zImage support. > > These changes are OK to do because: > > - omap-rng.c and hsmmc.c don't need plat/cpu.h > > - omap-aes.c and omap-sham.c get the proper platform_data > passed to them so they don't need extra checks in the driver > > - omap-dma.c and omap-pcm.c can test the arch locally as > omap1 and omap2 cannot be compiled together because of > conflicting compiler flags > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/platform_data/mmc-omap.h> > #include <mach/hardware.h> > -#include <plat/cpu.h> > > /* OMAP HSMMC Host Controller Registers */ > #define OMAP_HSMMC_SYSSTATUS 0x0014 Actually I'll fold this mmc change into an earlier patch I've posted as "ARM: OMAP: Split plat/mmc.h into local headers and platform_data". Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html