Hi Paul,
On 9/19/2012 5:48 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi Benoît,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 9/18/2012 4:12 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
The decision was made a few months ago to allow struct omap_hwmod
records and struct clk records to omit clockdomain information if the
clockdomain is not software-controllable. See for example commit
868c157df9721675c19729eed2c96bac6c3f1d01 ("ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: remove
prm_clkdm, cm_clkdm; allow hwmods to have no clockdomain").
So convert an existing pr_warning() to a pr_debug() (regarding missing
clockdomains in clocks), and add a pr_debug() for missing hwmod
clockdomains.
At some point I sent you a small RFC to still keep the message if neither
oh->clkdm nor oh->_clk->clkdm was there. I've never had the time to test it,
but that should then cover OMAP2, 3 & 4 cases.
OK let's plan to test and add something like that during the 3.8 time
frame... probably it should also depend on the value of clkdm_control.
It's not clear to me exactly what that conditional should look like...
OK, I was thinking of a more basic thing. If some more values have to be
checked it might be a little bit more tricky.
Let's see that later.
Thanks,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
