* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [120917 15:54]: > * Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120917 01:40]: > > Hi Tony, > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:50:02, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > > * Mohammed, Afzal: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:20 PM > > > > > > But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need > > > > to get it right. > > > > > > Reason has been identified. It was due to rounding error, > > > no changes are required in the expressions. Moving > > > completely to picoseconds resolves the issue. > > > > > > Can you please try with the attached patch ? > > Gave it a quick try and it seemed to work.. But when I tried > rebasing my patches for the cbus to keep things working with > the watchdog, I ran into multiple merge conflicts with > current linux next and gave up. OK went back to my original branch without current linux next and with the new cbus + retu driver from Aaro applied. Confirmed it's now working on n800 tusb6010. > Care to repost this series updated against current linux > next? > > I'm afraid I've pretty much lost track of all the patches > and rather not start resolving the conflicts as I'm sure > I'll break something else :) You should still repost the whole updated series against linux next. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html