RE: [PATCH v6 10/10] ARM: OMAP2+: tusb6010: generic timing calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tony,

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:04:10, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> > > This hangs n800 during the boot.

Paul reported that n800 stopped booting on OMAP baseline [1]
due to an mmc issue and has posted a solution [2].

Are you facing the same issue ?, if so, then it is not
due to this series.

I tried to get an n800, but has been unsuccessful.

Regards
Afzal

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=134685988517580&w=2
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg190879.html


> > 
> > Shall I read the above as n800 boot without patch 10/10,
> > but with the other patches in this series ?
> > 
> > As per the board file, n800 has tusb6010 as well as
> > OneNAND in sync read & async write mode, was OneNAND
> > working without 10/10.
> > 
> > Do you have any idea, which timing could have gone wrong,
> > can you please sent me DEBUG enabled gpmc log with and
> > without 10/10.
> 
> Can you please sent me GPMC DEBUG enabled logs with and
> without this series.

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux