On Wednesday 12 September 2012 03:21 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> -omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) >> > +omap_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) >> > { >> > struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id; >> > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > Shouldn't that be IRQ_NONE? Actually we are processing it so I thought it to be ok. Also a similar discussion. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-June/104422.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html