On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:12:15PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
>
> for OMAP2, we can easily switch over to threaded
> IRQs on the I2C driver. This will allow us to
> spend less time in hardirq context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> [Trivial formating changes]
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> index 4a696bd..e391370 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ enum {
> #define I2C_OMAP_ERRATA_I462 (1 << 1)
>
> struct omap_i2c_dev {
> + spinlock_t lock; /* IRQ synchronization */
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *base; /* virtual */
> int irq;
> @@ -854,9 +855,30 @@ static int omap_i2c_transmit_data(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev, u8 num_bytes,
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t
> -omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
> +omap_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id;
> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
Shouldn't that be IRQ_NONE?
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
