* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [120911 10:05]: > On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > On 9/11/2012 7:54 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > >>> Just curious to know how you came with some of the above header names ? > > >>> > > >>> plat/mcbsp ---> dsp-mcbsp.h > > >>> There is no connection of DSP with McBSP. "omap-mcbsp.h" would been a > > >>> better name. > > >> > > >> This one was a mistake on my side, as Tony and Peter already pointed out. > > >> How about asoc-mcbsp.h or asoc-omap-mcbsp.h? > > >> > > > After re-reading the cover-letter and your below response, > > > 'asoc-omap-mcbsp.h' seems to be fine. > > > > > > > Note that mcbsp is also applicable to Davinci family of devices. > > asoc-ti-mcbsp.h then? Sounds good to me. Whatever the name ends up being: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
