On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > On 9/11/2012 7:54 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > >>> Just curious to know how you came with some of the above header names ? > >>> > >>> plat/mcbsp ---> dsp-mcbsp.h > >>> There is no connection of DSP with McBSP. "omap-mcbsp.h" would been a > >>> better name. > >> > >> This one was a mistake on my side, as Tony and Peter already pointed out. > >> How about asoc-mcbsp.h or asoc-omap-mcbsp.h? > >> > > After re-reading the cover-letter and your below response, > > 'asoc-omap-mcbsp.h' seems to be fine. > > > > Note that mcbsp is also applicable to Davinci family of devices. asoc-ti-mcbsp.h then? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
