On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:09:24PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > You can't possibly understand what that'll print. First of all, VEN_ID_H > and VEN_ID_L should be ORed together. Second, the user will see the same > message four times in a row, with different values, but see that driver > claims that all four values refer to the device id. What this should do, > is at least combine all four messages into a single one of the format: > dev_(dbg|info)(&i2c->dev, "SMSCxxx devid: %02x rev: %02x venid: %02x\n", > devid, rev, (venid_h << 8) | venid_l); > or something similar. Yes, I agree that the formatting here should also be improved - as I said in one of my earlier mails if any of these things are fixed things that should never change the driver should instead verify the value rather than log it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
