Re: [PATCH 1/6] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Remove cpu_is_xxxx checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:27 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,

> > Yes, they can be overridden, but I think it's still quite difficult to
> > manage. DSS is modeled with multiple blocks, also in DT data. So you'd
> > need to override multiple entries.
> > 
> > And it'd also require a new dts file for each version of your board with
> > different ES version.
> > 
> > Also, I don't really see why this information would need to be present
> > in the DT data (especially as it's not simple). It's all trivially found
> > out in the code, by using cpu_is & soc_is.
> 
> Fair enough. I just think we should remove all cpu_is_* and soc_is_*
> from drivers.

I agree, that's part of the idea here. Instead of having cpu_is checks
all around, we'll have them in only certain centralized places. Then
it's easier to implement a way to move them totally out of the driver,
when we come up with a good idea how to accomplish that.

 Tomi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux