Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 August 2012 00:24, Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 3:50 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>> So in _enable:
>>
>>         _enable_clocks(oh);
>>         if (soc_ops.enable_module)
>>                 soc_ops.enable_module(oh);
>>
>> The enable_module part seems redundant to me, since the module should
>> be already enabled by the first call to _enable_clocks.
>
> Yes they do same thing, I believe the plan is to get rid of all clock
> leaf-nodes in the near future, and let hwmod handle module
> enable/disable part.

If this is the case then an enable_module call is needed in my patch
for when these changes are made. The original works fine but only
because currently clock framework does what enable_module is doing.

Paul,

Please let me know if you want me to resend with this change.

Regards,

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux