On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So if we make a change like this one, it seems like we would basically > expect it to break once we start doing anything meaningful with > clk_prepare(), like using clk_prepare() for voltage scaling or something > that requires I2C? We'd also probably want to mark this with some kind of > "HACK" comment. Hi Paul, Did you have anything in mind to start using clk_prepare? I still hope to get rid of it some day and replace that call with a combination of clk_enable and a check like clk_enable_can_sleep. Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
