On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 17:30 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during > > suspend > > > > Currently OMAP4 suspend puts all power domains to CSWR. OSWR is a deeper > > state that saves more power, but has higher latencies also. As suspend > > is considered a high-latency operation, OSWR is appropriate here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I'll update this to next rev if one is requested. > > No need, I'll add it in the local copy here. Thanks, thats what I thought. :) > > > (Kind of hoping this set would be reaching maturity already.) > > It kind of looks to me like there are two or three separate sets within > the series. My feeling is that Kevin should take the first two, then I > should take the rest other than 6 and 7. Then once those are queued, > we can pull in 6 and 7. Does that make sense to you? Yea, that looks good to me. Patches up from 6+ should only be pulled once the pre-reqs for this set are in also (io-chain + Jean's func pwrst stuff.) I haven't actually tried these patches without the pre-reqs lately, but I think they should be fine. -Tero -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
