On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 08:44 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> > > This one needs at least some short description for the changelog. Maybe > just a brief explanation that OSWR saves more energy that CSWR, but has > higher resume latency, and since resume from system suspend is considered > to be a high-latency operation, OSWR is appropriate here. Yea, I can add one. How about this: Subject: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during suspend Currently OMAP4 suspend puts all power domains to CSWR. OSWR is a deeper state that saves more power, but has higher latencies also. As suspend is considered a high-latency operation, OSWR is appropriate here. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> --- I'll update this to next rev if one is requested. (Kind of hoping this set would be reaching maturity already.) -Tero -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
