On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:25:16PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Mark A. Greer wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:54:53PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > > Want to try something like this? It's your patch but modified to not use > > > disable/enable_hlt(). If it doesn't work in your test case, maybe > > > try uncommenting that second set of deny_idle / allow_idle ... > > > > I tested the modified patch (to get it to compile) below. > > Doh, sorry about that. No worries. > > It did not work with or without the core_dpll_ck deny_idle/allow_idle > > commented out. > > Here's a version with some of the CPUIdle states restricted. Maybe try > this one if you're using CPUIdle? I wasn't but I tried this lastest patch with and without CPUidle... > If it happens to work, it would also be interesting to know if it works > with the CORE DPLL part commented out. ...and, unfortunately, it didnt' work in either case. Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
