RE: OMAP PM late init with DT blob

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 21:52:41, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> 
> > I checked the different inits which get skipped right now. I think _init_voltages()
> > should not really be dependent on the DT check to cover the cases wherein the voltages
> > are controlled using a regular regulator driver. However right now I don't know what
> > approach to take here. For now I have sent an RFC patch [1] with just the movement of
> > suspend ops.
> 
> That seems reasonable based on a quick glance.  Why not update your patch 
> to just keep that code where it is and wrap the the pmic and voltage late 
> init in that DT test?
> 
Done. I had somehow messed up Kevin's address also :\ Fixed now.

Regards,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux