Re: [PATCHv10 1/7] I2C: OMAP: I2C register restore only if context is lost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 25 June 2012 06:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
> how will this ever work with DT ? 
What you say makes sense however that is what currently
most of the omap drivers do.

Will check on this.
> I say we get rid of the OMAP-specific
> API and build this "context lost" status directly on dev_pm_info and
> have something like pm_runtime_lost_context() or something with pm QoS
> tell you if a device has lost its context.
>
> Also, your commit log doesn't really state any problems you might have
> reached before, or any improvements wrt latency coming out of suspend
> and so on.
>
> IMHO, drivers need a generic way to differentiate if they're resuming
> from OFF or RET, otherwise we will end up with a bunch of OMAP-specific
> hackery on all drivers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux