* Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> [120607 06:28]: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > > an OMAP thing. > > > > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > > wouldn't make any sense. > > > > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > > whom. > > Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should > _not_ got via the MTD tree. What Russell is suggesting works good for me. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
