Re: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together,
> because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely
> an OMAP thing.
> 
> The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and
> SA11x0 changes.  We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that
> wouldn't make any sense.
> 
> What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets
> pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my
> tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by
> whom.

Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should
_not_ got via the MTD tree.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux