Re: [RFC 00/24] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 01 June 2012 07:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

This RFC series is based of Mikes' latest clk-next. I will
rebase it once 3.5-rc1 is out and post with more testing thats
in progress. Meanwhile, the RFC is for me to get some early
feedback on the patches.

Please describe further what's been tested with this series, and what
hasn't been.

Hi Paul,

I have been mostly boot-testing on the OMAP3/4 boards I have access to, 3430SDP, 3630 Beagle, 4430 Panda/SDP. Apart from this I was using
omapconf to run the clkspeed audit tests on OMAP4.
I used powerdebug to make sure the tree modeling (parent/child
relations, clk rates etc) are sane after bootup.
I haven't done any low power tests around suspend/idle for OMAP3
or OMAP4 which is on my list to do before I do a repost/rebase on
3.5-rc1. And so is testing on OMAP2430sdp and N800. Any other tests
you recommend I do?

Meanwhile it would be good to know if you see any major issues around
the migration itself and/or the way the patches are structured.

regards,
Rajendra



- Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux