* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [120531 02:26]: > On Thursday 31 May 2012, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > > > > > > Just put the devices you actually want into the device tree instead and > > > have them automatically created. > > > > But shouldn't device tree support and non-device tree support co-exist > > till the non-device tree is completely knocked out of the kernel? Even > > Well, it's a new driver, so there is no regression in supporting it only > on DT-enabled boards. OMAP5 is DT-only anyway and OMAP4 only supports two > boards that should both be working with the generic DT code already. I agree, let's keep the new omap4/5 drivers DT only. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
