On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 15:10 -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > Added similar PM errata flag support as omap3 has. A few errata flags >> > will be added in subsequent patches. >> >> Considering that we might have erratas for future SoCs as well, >> should'nt we just >> set up a common errata flag for all SoCs and since we have i123 numbers, would >> it help being able to reuse errata flags cross SoC generations (if we need to)? > > Not sure... how quickly do we run out of bits that way? :) Also, at > least pm34xx / pm44xx erratas don't have anything in common. We can > probably re-use pm44xx erratas for omap5 though. > > One annoyance is that, the OMAP4 erratas are going to have a number of > ROM code erratas on them, which don't really have any public i123 > numbers available. >.< Sounds good to me. Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
